Skip to main content
All notable changes to the QWED platform, listed by release.

QWED Math Engine — fail-closed on mode ambiguity, eigenvalue cardinality, and IRR convergence

Released: July 24, 2026 · Jump to details · PR #217 · PR #218 · PR #219
Three core-verifier fixes tighten the math engine’s fail-closed contract. verify_statistics(statistic="mode"), verify_matrix_operation(operation="eigenvalues"), and verify_irr() no longer produce VERIFIED when the underlying claim is ambiguous, under-specified, or numerically unproven. Callers see BLOCKED or CORRECTION_NEEDED with structured diagnostics instead of a best-effort answer.
Behavior change. Inputs that previously received VERIFIED may now receive BLOCKED or CORRECTION_NEEDED — treat both as unverified. If your code branched on result.verified or result.status == "VERIFIED" alone, it will continue to work; if you consumed calculated/calculated_irr/calculated_eigenvalues from a BLOCKED result as a fallback, those fields are not present on BLOCKED responses. They remain available on CORRECTION_NEEDED responses for diagnostic use. Consume the new structured fields (ambiguous_modes, calculated_count/claimed_count, converged, iterations_used) for richer diagnostics.

What changed

  • verify_statistics(statistic="mode") requires a unique mode. When two or more values tie for the maximum frequency, the engine returns BLOCKED with an ambiguous_modes list instead of heuristically picking one. Only a unique mode can produce VERIFIED.
  • verify_matrix_operation(operation="eigenvalues") requires cardinality match. The claimed eigenvalue list length must equal the calculated count (counting algebraic multiplicity). Mismatched lengths return CORRECTION_NEEDED with calculated_count/claimed_count. Previously the value comparison used zip, which silently truncated to the shorter list.
  • verify_irr() requires proof of Newton-Raphson convergence. BLOCKED is now returned when cash flows have more than one sign change (multi-root ambiguity per Descartes’ rule), zero sign changes (no real IRR), all-zero cash flows (IRR undefined), the Newton derivative stalls at zero, or the method fails to converge within 100 iterations. Successful results include converged: true and iterations_used.

Before and after

Ambiguous mode
Incomplete eigenvalue claim
IRR with multiple sign changes

What this means for you

Existing code that already treated non-VERIFIED statuses as unverified continues to work. New policy code should read the structured diagnostic fields on BLOCKED/CORRECTION_NEEDED results — ambiguous_modes, calculated_count/claimed_count, and converged/iterations_used — to explain why a claim was rejected and to satisfy audit requirements. See Math engine — Fail-closed semantics for the full state tables and response schemas.

QWED-Finance — v2.1.0 released

Released: July 22, 2026 · GitHub PR #40
qwed-finance v2.1.0 is now the current release. This is a version-sync release: the Python package, npm wrapper, GitHub Action, and quickstart workflow reference are all realigned so QWED Finance Guard reports a single consistent version across PyPI, npm, and SARIF output in GitHub Advanced Security.

What changed

  • qwed-finance Python package is now v2.1.0 on PyPI (qwed_finance.__version__ == "2.1.0").
  • @qwed-ai/finance npm package version bumped to 2.1.0 to match.
  • GitHub Action auto-syncs its reported version from the installed package — the QWED Finance Guard name in workflow logs and the version field on SARIF uploads to the GitHub Security tab now both read 2.1.0 instead of a hardcoded v2.0.
  • Quickstart qwed-verify.yml workflow is re-pinned from the stale v1.1.4 SHA to the v2.1.0 SHA (QWED-AI/qwed-finance@19ce969f21d1fc2019da4d89fff23bc108e15a98 # v2.1.0).

What this means for you

Upgrade your dependency to pick up the current release:
If you run QWED Finance in CI, update the action reference so SARIF findings and workflow-run names line up with the current package:
This is a version-sync patch for the existing v2.1.0 release (May 2026). It contains no new API or guard behavior changes beyond those already shipped in v2.1.0 (Decimal migration, fail-closed enforcement, rate parsing fix). For the original breaking changes, see the v2.1.0 release notes. See GitHub Action (CI/CD) for the updated workflow example.

QWED-UCP — v0.3.0 released

Released: July 20, 2026 · GitHub PR #38
qwed-ucp v0.3.0 is now the current release. This version ships the typed TrustStatus enum on every verification result, alongside the fail-closed middleware and internal-error handling delivered over the v0.2.x series.

What changed

  • qwed-ucp Python package is now v0.3.0 on PyPI.
  • Express middleware qwed-ucp-middleware package version bumped to match.
  • TrustStatus enum is confirmed as available from v0.3.0 onward — see Trust status for the full state table and usage.
  • GitHub Action should now be pinned to QWED-AI/qwed-ucp@v0.3.0.

What this means for you

Upgrade your dependency to pick up the current release:
If you audit checkouts in CI, update the action reference:
Existing code that branches on result.verified continues to work unchanged. New code should branch on result.status (a TrustStatus) to distinguish FAILED from ENGINE_ERROR, UNVERIFIABLE, and other non-VERIFIED verdicts.

QWED-UCP — Express middleware fails closed on internal verification errors

Released: July 18, 2026 · GitHub PR #36
When a guard raised an unexpected exception, the Express middleware previously logged the error and called next() — letting an unverified checkout through to the downstream handler. That defeated the trust boundary. The catch block now short-circuits with HTTP 500, X-QWED-Verified: false, and code: "INTERNAL_VERIFICATION_ERROR" so an internal crash can no longer be mistaken for a passing verification.

What changed

  • Express middleware catch block is now fail-closed. On any exception raised during verifyCheckoutLocally(), the middleware returns:
    The underlying exception is logged server-side via console.error but is not included in the response body — raw stack traces, file paths, and internal messages stay out of client-visible output.
  • X-QWED-Verified: false is set on the 500 response so upstream policy layers can treat it the same as a 422 failure.
  • npm package fix. qwed-ucp-middleware.js is now included in the published files array. Previous versions installed via npm were missing the entrypoint that index.js required at runtime.
Behavior change. Any client code that treated an Express middleware error as a soft pass (e.g. retrying without checking the status, or relying on next() being called) will now see a 500. Treat 500 INTERNAL_VERIFICATION_ERROR the same as 422 VERIFICATION_FAILED — the request has not been verified and must not be settled.

What this means for you

Existing integrations that already branched on X-QWED-Verified or on the response status keep working — they just start seeing a new 500 path that was previously invisible. New integrations should treat both 4xx and 5xx responses from the middleware as an unverified request. See Express.js middleware — Fail-closed on internal verification errors for the full response contract.

QWED-UCP — typed TrustStatus enum on every verification result

Released: July 15, 2026 · GitHub PR #33
Verification results previously exposed a single verified: bool that collapsed “proof disproved,” “proof could not be established,” “input outside supported semantics,” and “verifier engine crashed” into the same False bucket. Every result dataclass now also carries a typed status: TrustStatus field so downstream policy code can make trust-aware decisions without parsing error strings.

What changed

  • New TrustStatus enum exported from qwed_ucp with seven states: VERIFIED, FAILED, UNVERIFIABLE, UNSUPPORTED, PARTIAL, ENGINE_ERROR, and QUARANTINED (reserved).
  • status field on every resultGuardResult, UCPVerificationResult, and each per-guard result type (MoneyGuardResult, StateGuardResult, SchemaGuardResult, LineItemsGuardResult, DiscountGuardResult, CurrencyGuardResult, RefundGuardResult, TipGuardResult, FeeGuardResult, AttestationResult).
  • UCPVerifier.verify_checkout() now surfaces ENGINE_ERROR when any guard raises an exception, instead of silently collapsing to verified=False.
  • verified: bool is preserved as a backward-compatible derived field: result.verified is True only when result.status == TrustStatus.VERIFIED. Existing constructors that pass verified=True/verified=False continue to produce the corresponding VERIFIED/FAILED status.

What this means for you

Existing code that reads result.verified or constructs results with verified=... keeps working unchanged. New policy code should branch on result.status to distinguish a disproved proof from a crashed verifier — see Trust status for the full state table and an example.

QWED-UCP — middleware fails closed on empty and non-JSON request bodies

Released: July 14, 2026 · GitHub PR #32
The FastAPI and Express middleware previously forwarded requests with an empty body, malformed JSON, or a non-object JSON payload to the downstream handler without running any guards. On a /checkout-sessions route that defeated the trust boundary — an attacker could send {}’s worth of nothing and skip verification. Both middlewares now reject those requests with HTTP 422, X-QWED-Verified: false, and code: "UNPARSEABLE_REQUEST" before the handler runs.

What changed

  • FastAPI: returns a distinct message per case:
    • Empty body → "Empty request body: cannot verify empty payload"
    • Malformed or non-UTF-8 body → "Malformed request body: expected JSON"
    • Top-level non-object JSON → "Invalid request body: expected JSON object"
  • Express: all three cases return "Empty or non-JSON request body: cannot verify unparseable payload".
  • Non-protected methods and paths (for example, GET /health or a POST to a route outside verify_paths) still pass through untouched.
This is a fail-closed behavior change. Any client that was previously reaching a /checkout-sessions, /checkout, /cart, or /payment handler with a missing, malformed, or non-object JSON body will now receive 422 UNPARSEABLE_REQUEST instead. Send checkout payloads as application/json with a JSON object at the top level, or narrow verify_paths if a route should not be treated as a checkout endpoint.

What this means for you

If you deploy QWED-UCP as middleware in front of a UCP merchant server, unparseable requests can no longer bypass the guards. See FastAPI middleware, Express.js middleware, and the troubleshooting entry for the exact response shape and how to configure protected paths.

QWED-A2A — persistent signing key and JWKS discovery endpoint

Released: July 10, 2026 · GitHub PR #29
A2ACryptoService no longer generates an ephemeral ECDSA P-256 key per process. The signing key is now loaded from the QWED_A2A_SIGNING_KEY_PEM environment variable (or the pem_key constructor argument) so attestation JWTs issued before a restart remain verifiable afterwards. A new /.well-known/jwks.json endpoint publishes the current public key for external consumers.

What changed

  • Persistent signing keyA2ACryptoService reads an unencrypted PKCS#8 P-256 PEM from QWED_A2A_SIGNING_KEY_PEM on first use. The derived key_id is a SHA-256 fingerprint of the public key, so it stays stable as long as the PEM does.
  • Fail-closed on missing keysign_verdict, verify_attestation, get_public_key_jwk, and A2AVerificationInterceptor.intercept() all raise RuntimeError when the PEM is missing, malformed, or uses a curve other than SECP256R1. The FastAPI gateway surfaces this as HTTP 503 Signing key unavailable.
  • JWKS endpoint — A new wellknown_router exposes GET /.well-known/jwks.json for downstream services and auditors to fetch the current public key without an out-of-band exchange.
  • get_public_key_jwk() — Returns the current public key as a JWK (kty, crv, x, y, kid, use, alg).

Breaking changes

A2ACryptoService() and A2AVerificationInterceptor() no longer produce a working signer without configuration. Every deployment must now set QWED_A2A_SIGNING_KEY_PEM (and continue to set QWED_A2A_DEPLOYMENT_ID) before the service starts. Generate a key with:
Load the PEM into QWED_A2A_SIGNING_KEY_PEM from your secrets manager, and make sure every replica in a logical deployment uses the same PEM so their kids match and tokens cross-verify.

What this means for you

If you deploy the QWED-A2A gateway, you now get audit continuity across restarts and rolling deployments — a JWT signed by an earlier process is still verifiable by the next one, provided the PEM is unchanged. External services can also verify attestations by fetching /.well-known/jwks.json directly. See Crypto attestations and Deployment for the full setup, JWKS shape, and key rotation guidance.

QWED-Tax — structured 3-layer diagnostics for TDS, ITC, and GST-RCM

Released: June 21, 2026 · GitHub PR #45
QWED-Tax adopts the same 3-layer DiagnosticResult contract introduced in QWED-Verification v5.2.0 — as an independent model, no cross-package dependency. The first three guards (TDS, Input Tax Credit, GST reverse-charge) now expose a structured diagnostic in addition to their existing dict response.

What’s new

  • Tri-state status — Every diagnostic resolves to VERIFIED, UNVERIFIABLE, or BLOCKED. No HEURISTIC or AMBIGUOUS middle ground.
  • Three disclosure layers — A short agent-safe summary (no statute IDs or detection logic), a structured developer evidence block (constraint ID, statute, jurisdiction, audit trace, deduction, net payable), and an optional proof reference.
  • Proof reference is the authority bit — A deterministic sha256 hash of the audit trace, present only when a result is VERIFIED. Absent on UNVERIFIABLE and BLOCKED.
  • First migrationsTDSGuard, InputCreditGuard, and GSTGuard (reverse-charge) each expose the new diagnostic format alongside their existing return shape.

Compatibility

Additive release. The legacy dict API on every guard is unchanged — the diagnostic format is opt-in. Existing integrations continue to work without modification. The remaining nine QWED-Tax guards (CapitalGains, Classification, Speculation, Setoff, Crypto, Valuation, Remittance, PoEM, Withholding) will migrate in follow-up releases.

What this means for you

If you’ve already adopted the QWED-Verification diagnostic contract, the same response shape now applies to TDS, ITC, and GST-RCM checks — including the proof-reference authority bit you can gate execution on. See the Verification Diagnostics guide for the response shape and the tax guards reference for guard-by-guard coverage.

QWED-Tax — exact paise comparison, edge-case input rejection, and strict payload schemas

Released: June 21, 2026 · GitHub PR #44
Three input-strictness fixes ship together. CryptoTaxGuard.verify_flat_tax_rate now compares quantized paise values exactly instead of within a 0.1 tolerance, ValuationGuard and RemittanceGuard reject the edge-case numeric inputs that previously slipped through, and every QWED-Tax Pydantic input model now forbids unexpected fields.

What changed

  • CryptoTaxGuard.verify_flat_tax_rate — The Decimal("0.1") tolerance was removed. Both the computed expected_tax and the caller’s claimed_tax are now quantized to two decimal places using ROUND_HALF_UP and compared with an exact ==. A 1-paise (0.01) deviation correctly returns verified=False.
  • ValuationGuard.verify_conversion — Added explicit range checks: discount must be in [0, 1), and cap, next_round_price, and investment must all be strictly positive. DivisionByZero is now caught alongside InvalidOperation so a degenerate cap = 0 or discount = 1 no longer crashes — it fails closed with a structured {"verified": False, "error": "..."} response. The previous behavior allowed a discount > 1 to produce a negative share count.
  • RemittanceGuard.verify_lrs_limit — After numeric parsing, amount_usd and financial_year_usage are now checked for negativity. Negative inputs return {"verified": False, "error": "BLOCKED: ..."} instead of being summed into the limit check, where a negative usage could mask a transaction that exceeds the $250,000 LRS cap.
  • Input modelsAddress, WorkArrangement, WorkerClassificationParams, ContractorPayment, TaxEntry, DeductionEntry, PayrollEntry, and VerificationResult are now configured with model_config = ConfigDict(extra="forbid"). Any payload with an unexpected key raises a Pydantic ValidationError at the boundary. QWEDTaxMiddleware already surfaces this as status: "BLOCKED" with risk: "INVALID_PAYLOAD".

Breaking changes

Callers that previously relied on the 0.1-rupee tolerance in CryptoTaxGuard.verify_flat_tax_rate will now receive verified=False for claims that differ from vda_income * 0.30 by 1 paise or more. Round your claimed tax to two decimal places with ROUND_HALF_UP before calling the guard.
Payloads sent through QWEDTaxMiddleware (or constructed directly with the QWED-Tax input models) that include keys outside the declared schema now raise ValidationError. Strip unknown fields from AI-generated output — including typos and speculative overrides like "override_verification": true — before invoking the middleware.
ValuationGuard.verify_conversion no longer returns a result for cap <= 0, next_round_price <= 0, investment <= 0, discount < 0, or discount >= 1. These inputs now return {"verified": False, "error": "..."} instead of crashing or producing nonsensical share counts.

What this means for you

If your agent forwards Indian VDA tax claims, startup conversion math, or LRS remittance requests through QWED-Tax, audit the calling code for: (1) tax claims that aren’t pre-quantized to two decimal places, (2) discount/cap/investment inputs that can legitimately be zero or out of range, (3) negative remittance amounts being passed defensively, and (4) AI payloads that include fields not declared on the QWED-Tax input models. See the CryptoTaxGuard, ValuationGuard, RemittanceGuard, and middleware integration guide for the updated contracts.

Audit reference


QWED-Tax — middleware never returns full “verified” and ReciprocityGuard no longer always-passes

Released: June 21, 2026 · GitHub PR #43
Two fail-closed fixes ship together. The Gusto interceptor middleware no longer overstates a gross-to-net arithmetic pass as full tax verification, and ReciprocityGuard no longer returns verified=True for arrangements with no reciprocity agreement.
ARITHMETIC_VERIFIED is a pre-conformance middleware-layer status, not part of the DiagnosticResult tri-state vocabulary (VERIFIED / UNVERIFIABLE / BLOCKED) introduced in v5.2.0. The middleware will migrate to DiagnosticResult when engine-conformance work lands. Until then, treat ARITHMETIC_VERIFIED as a distinct middleware signal — it is not equivalent to VERIFIED.

What changed

  • QWEDTaxMiddleware.process_ai_payroll_request — The success response is now status: "ARITHMETIC_VERIFIED" with execution_permitted: false. The middleware only verifies gross-to-net math; classification, withholding legality, reciprocity, and filing checks are still required before execution. The response includes checks_run (what was verified) and checks_not_run (what is still required) so callers can decide what to run next.
  • TaxPreFlight report — Every report now includes a checks_not_run list covering both unselected guards and known gaps (checks not yet implemented for the action). For example, action="hire" reports payroll_arithmetic, withholding_legality, reciprocity, and filing_obligations as known gaps.
  • ReciprocityGuard — The Z3 solver was removed (the prior expression was tautologically satisfiable and ignored the same_state parameter). The guard is now a deterministic lookup against the reciprocity-pair table with explicit fail-closed paths: same state → verified, known pair → verified, no agreement → verified=False, unknown state → verified=False. A new verify_reciprocity(residence_state, work_state, same_state=None) method takes string inputs; determine_withholding_state(arrangement) is kept for backwards compatibility.
The reciprocity-pair table covers only the pairs modeled within the State enum’s 8-state scope (NJ, PA, MD, VA). Pennsylvania has additional reciprocity agreements (with IN, MI, OH, VA, WV, WI) that are not modeled here because those states are not in the enum. VA-PA in particular is a known gap — callers will receive verified=False for that pair until the enum and table are extended.

Breaking changes

The middleware no longer returns status: "VERIFIED" or execution_permitted: true. Any caller that gated execution on decision["status"] == "VERIFIED" or decision["execution_permitted"] being truthy will now always block. Update your integration to handle ARITHMETIC_VERIFIED and run the checks listed in checks_not_run (worker classification, withholding legality, reciprocity, filing) before forwarding to Gusto/Avalara.
ReciprocityGuard no longer returns verified=True for state pairs without a reciprocity agreement. Callers that previously relied on a Z3-backed “always sat” result for, e.g., NJ → NY will now correctly receive verified=False. Route these to your withholding logic for the work state or to human review.

What this means for you

If your agent forwards payroll payloads to Gusto/Avalara based on a VERIFIED status from the middleware, those calls will start blocking until you run the remaining guards (ClassificationGuard, WithholdingGuard, ReciprocityGuard.verify_reciprocity, Form1099Guard) yourself. See the tax integration guide for the updated response shape and the ReciprocityGuard reference for the new lookup contract.

Audit reference


QWED-Tax — fail-closed on ambiguous classification and unverified claims

Released: June 21, 2026 · GitHub PR #42
Six more QWED-Tax guards now refuse to sign off when they can’t independently prove a result. Ambiguous worker classifications, unparseable trade dates, unknown set-off heads, and reverse-charge inputs the guard doesn’t recognize all return verified=False with a structured error instead of a quiet pass.

Bug fixes

  • CapitalGainsGuard — Unparseable acquisition or disposal dates and unknown asset types now block instead of being coerced into a sentinel value that flowed through to verified=True. SLAB-rate verification can no longer succeed without an income bracket — slab rates can’t be proven from the claim alone.
  • ClassificationGuard — Mixed employee/contractor signals now return verified=False with an “ambiguous classification” error. The guard only returns CONTRACTOR when no employee indicators are present.
  • SpeculationGuard — Set-off verification now requires a known income source (intraday, f&o, futures, options, delivery, business, capital_gains). Unrecognized sources are blocked instead of silently treated as non-speculative.
  • InterHeadAdjustmentGuard — Set-off eligibility now runs against an explicit allowlist of heads. Salary loss set-off is added to the prohibition matrix, and unknown heads are blocked rather than defaulting to allow.
  • GSTGuard (RCM) — Unrecognized service or entity types in reverse-charge checks now surface as a verified=False error naming the unknown value, instead of being coerced to OTHER or INDIVIDUAL and potentially suppressing a statutory RCM obligation. The verifier also gained an optional claim parameter — when you pass a claimed_is_rcm value, the guard compares it to the computed result and only returns verified=True on an exact match. Calls without the claim get a computed_only=True flag so calculation and verification are no longer conflated.
  • CryptoTaxGuard — Zero VDA income now verifies a claimed tax of zero, instead of returning verified=True regardless of claim. Negative VDA income (a loss) returns verified=False with a message directing the caller to use verify_set_off for loss treatment — the method does not internally invoke verify_set_off, so callers must handle the verified=False branch explicitly.

What this means for you

If your agent relied on any of these guards returning verified=True for inputs they don’t model — ambiguous worker status, unknown set-off heads, unrecognized RCM service types, or capital-gains transactions with malformed dates — those calls now block. Surface the error to a human reviewer or extend the guard’s configured rules before re-running. See the QWED-Tax guards reference for the updated contracts on each guard.

QWED-Tax — fail-closed on unknown tax rules

Released: June 19, 2026
Tax guards no longer silently pass when they encounter a service, asset, jurisdiction, or payment type they don’t model. Six guards now return verified=False with a structured error instead of an unsafe default.

What changed

  • TDSGuard — unrecognized payment categories no longer return “verified, zero deduction.” This closes a path where an agent could classify a payment into an unknown bucket and have it execute with no withholding. TaxPreFlight now blocks these payments.
  • CapitalGainsGuard — unknown asset class or holding term fails closed instead of returning “no hard constraint.”
  • NexusGuard — states not in the configured risk list now require manual review instead of being treated as low-risk.
  • AddressGuard — unknown state codes fail closed with “manual review required” instead of “assumed valid.”
  • Form1099Guard (US) — unmodeled payment types return filing_required=None with a manual-determination flag, instead of defaulting to “no filing required.”
  • InputCreditGuard (GST)verified=True remains the legal default (ITC is allowed unless specifically blocked), but unknown categories now carry an explicit unverified_category=True flag in the result and an audit_trace entry of category_match: "default_allow" so downstream consumers can distinguish known-eligible from default-allowed.

What this means for you

If your agent currently relies on a verified=True response for inputs the guards don’t model, those calls will start blocking. Add explicit rules for the categories you care about, or route unverified results to human review. See the tax guards reference and tax integration guide for the updated contracts.

QWED-Infra — ecosystem policy framework adopted

Released: June 17, 2026
qwed-infra now ships with the shared QWED governance baseline: QWED_RULES.md, contributor guidance, PR template, CodeRabbit config, and a boundary-check workflow that is consistent with the other QWED repositories.
No runtime behavior changes. Affects contributors and anyone consuming the repository’s CI.

QWED-MCP — boundary-check parity with QWED-Infra

Released: June 18, 2026
The qwed-mcp boundary-check tool now catches the same import-alias, module-alias, wildcard-import, eval/exec alias, and shell=True patterns that qwed-infra does, and fails closed when the scan root is missing.

What this means for you

If you run qwed-mcp boundary checks in CI, expect to catch additional bypass patterns that previously slipped through. Existing passing scans should continue to pass; previously hidden findings may now surface as failures. See the MCP tools reference for the current rule set.

QWED Open Responses v0.3.0 — version sync and dependency fix

Released: June 12, 2026
Aligns qwed-open-responses with the rest of the QWED package versions and patches a transitive qs CVE flagged by Dependabot.
No API changes. Upgrade to pick up the dependency fix.

v5.2.0 — Structured Verification Diagnostics

Released: June 19, 2026 · GitHub Release · Minor
Introduces the unified 3-layer DiagnosticResult model — the diagnostic contract that all QWED verification engines will conform to. This is an additive release: no existing engine return types are changed. Engine conformance is tracked in blocked issues (#129, #130, #131, #133, #134, #162, #163, #164, #190, #205).

New: DiagnosticResult model

Three disclosure layers:
  • Layer 1 — Agent-Safe: agent_message: str — agent/model-facing summary, no internals leaked
  • Layer 2 — Developer: developer_fields: dict — structured evidence (constraint_id, advisory_checks, methods_used, evidence)
  • Layer 3 — Proof: proof_ref: Optional[str] — sha256 hash of retained proof artifact; the authority bit

Key design

  • Tri-state statusVERIFIED / UNVERIFIABLE / BLOCKED only. No HEURISTIC or AMBIGUOUS proliferation; richer distinctions live in developer_fields.constraint_id
  • proof_ref is the authority bit — present = admissible for control flow, None = reject. No separate authoritative boolean needed (resolves #190 design debate)
  • VERIFIED requires proof — structurally enforced in __post_init__; “VERIFIED without proof” is impossible to construct
  • Frozen dataclassesDiagnosticResult and AdvisoryCheck are frozen=True; post-construction mutation blocked
  • Advisory checks never influence verdictsAdvisoryCheck.advisory_only=True enforced via __post_init__
  • compute_proof_ref() — deterministic sha256 hashing of JSON-serialized evidence
  • from_legacy_dict() — migration helper for ad-hoc engine dicts (fail-closed states only; raises for legacy VERIFIED)

Version propagation

Tests

83 new tests covering: status taxonomy, all 3 layers, authority contract, fail-closed enforcement, advisory checks, proof hashing determinism, serialization round-trip, legacy migration, frozen dataclass immutability, and realistic scenarios drawn from the 10 blocked issues.

Compatibility

Additive release. No breaking changes. Existing VerificationResult dataclasses and ad-hoc engine dicts continue to work. DiagnosticResult is opt-in — engines migrate incrementally.

Included PRs

  • #206 — feat(diagnostics): unified 3-layer DiagnosticResult model (#204)
  • #207 — release: v5.2.0 version propagation
See the Verification Diagnostics guide for full API documentation.
Older entries: Changelog Archive